http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/04/rossi-says-that-over-the-years-has-blown-up-37-e-cats/
"" One of the questioner asked, “Another fun question: How many reactors have you blown up? (You have experimented to determine the safest size/pressures/temperatures. Stress testing is important!)” Rossi’s answer: “37 (all recorded, with the supposed reasons of the event)” http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473#comments He also said regarding safety: “The replication of the effect along the patent has to be made by professionals. It is dangerous, if made by amateurs, because there are explosion dangers and because the nickel powders are toxic. The manipulations must be made in professional laboratories, with professional protection devices (http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3124295.ece) "" Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Rossi has written on his blog about having had many explosions. I want >> to >> > see one (somewhere isolated where nobody can get hurt). That would be >> > interesting ... and fun. >> >> >> I searched his responses on JoNP and never found him to use the word >> "explosions". He did say that he destroyed up to a thousand reactors >> in testing his product; but, I never found where he said there was an >> explosion. >> >> Do you have a citation? >> > >This is fairly typical -- I remember seeing him mention it several times: > >" > > - Andrea Rossi > July 13th, 2010 at 2:50 >PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=211&cpage=2#comment-2614> > > Dear Prof. Celani, > I am really pleased from the fact that you looked at our work. I know > who you are and I thank you really for your attention. > Our standard module consumes 500 watts and yields constantly and with > absolute reliability, with no risks that radiations exit the reactor and > with no risks of explosion, 4 kW. We obtained much higher efficiencies, as > you can read on the Focardi-Rossi paper published on the Journal Of Nuclear > Physics, but now I had to find a compromise to manufacture power plants > with absolute reliability under the point of view of safety. The excess of > energy follows a K= 8 at the moment. We reached a K 400, *but we got > explosions.* I can get risks when I amk alone, but to sell a reliable > product I have to go down to 8, right now. We are manufacturing a 1 MW > plant made with 125 modules. > With 1 g of Ni I got 750 kW. > Again thank you for your attention." > >http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=211 > >In addition to the mention of explosion, Rossi was gratified in July that >Celani looked at this work. Now Celani is a snake because he made it easy >for Rossi to get an easy and cheap and quick test of his device.
