That people conspired together to steal the IP / trade secrets says it
is not prior knowledge.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:33 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Technically, Rossi still has to prove the "I" part of the IP, besides,
he must show that it is not based on prior art from Piantelli.
2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat <aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
<mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>>
More like just another snake who needed the spectrum to work out
Rossi's key IP. If proven, all involved are just common thieves.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, if that is confirmed, we can put Piantelli also as a
scammer, from the point of view of the hardest skeptics.
2011/11/29 Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
<mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com>
<mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
<mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com>>>
On 2011-11-29 12:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
For what it's worth, Daniele Passerini on a recent comment
in his
Blog [1] is saying that when Roy Virgilio denied any
relationship
between Piantelli and DGT, he answered him privately that
according to his sources both do have an agreement, but he
(Daniele) wouldn't comment publicly about it before this matter
got clearer. Today's NyTeknik article according to him gives
credit to the information he was given.
[1]
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/ma-facciamola-finita.html
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
