Technically, Rossi still has to prove the "I" part of the IP, besides, he must show that it is not based on prior art from Piantelli.
2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat <[email protected]> > More like just another snake who needed the spectrum to work out Rossi's > key IP. If proven, all involved are just common thieves. > > AG > > > On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> So, if that is confirmed, we can put Piantelli also as a scammer, from >> the point of view of the hardest skeptics. >> >> 2011/11/29 Akira Shirakawa <[email protected] <mailto: >> shirakawa.akira@gmail.**com <[email protected]>>> >> >> >> On 2011-11-29 12:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote: >> >> Hello group, >> >> >> For what it's worth, Daniele Passerini on a recent comment in his >> Blog [1] is saying that when Roy Virgilio denied any relationship >> between Piantelli and DGT, he answered him privately that >> according to his sources both do have an agreement, but he >> (Daniele) wouldn't comment publicly about it before this matter >> got clearer. Today's NyTeknik article according to him gives >> credit to the information he was given. >> >> [1] >> http://22passi.blogspot.com/**2011/11/ma-facciamola-finita.**html<http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/ma-facciamola-finita.html> >> >> > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
