This is an exercise in futility but I copied part of a message I posted here to the Defkalion forum:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4232#p4232 Defkalion GT wrote: A lot of people asked us to perform independent third party test. Fine we will do. Tests need to be prepared with protocols, and protocols require specs. Otherwise tests are "blind" and only on a black box, not covering areas like safety, stability or functionality. A black box test would be fine. There is no need to cover safety, stability or functionality in the initial test. The specifications you supplied are not needed. I urge you to have a third party do a black box test as soon as possible. Your claims have no credibility without third party verification. I would point out also that Stremmenos, a member of your Board of Directors, continues to claim that you do not have working reactors. See: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article ... +%28pdf%29<http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3358406.ece/BINARY/Letter+from+Stremmenos+Nov2011+%28pdf%29> This controversy has dragged on for months. You can easily put a stop to it by allowing a black-box test. Frankly, I find it difficult to believe that you have not respond to this public relations fiasco. It is appalling. If I ran a company and a member of the Board of Directors was saying what Stremmenos says, I would take immediate steps to set the record straight, with third-party independent testing.
