For the simple wire-swap to have occurred, you would really need binary power states of "on and off". In the September and early October tests, as the power was never zero, you would have to get more creative to explain the non-zero amperage observed for the power controller and frequency generator when "self sustain" mode began. By no strech-of-the-imagination am I saying that Rossi's tests were conclusive. I'm just stating that, no matter how simple and elegant, this method of fraud, as described, was not used.
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:35:21 -0800 Subject: Re: [Vo]:a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat From: [email protected] To: [email protected] On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:24 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: I suggest that the fact that the current into the resistive heater elements was measured also eliminates this kind of magic. I don't believe that was ever done. It probably doesn't matter but if anyone knows of it being done, I'd sure like to see it.
