On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > And he repeats in a message today that his Ni is enriched in the > isotopes 64 and 62- and this is not believable.
Why is that not believable? A small amount of enrichment can't require that much energy, given that Ni-64 is heavier than the most abundant isotope Ni-58 by a hopping 10%, making separation way easier than, say, uranium enrichment. -- Berke Durak
