Dear Susan, very interesting - the same idea re answering of Rossi is in my essay I will publish later today on my blog Ego Out. Peter
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Susan Gipp <[email protected]> wrote: > A.R. like a wet piece of soap, is a master in answering with void answers. > The user asked why he doesn't start the University R&D program and he > answer that it's already started by the *Customer*. So there's no need > anymore to waste half a million euros to start wit the U: the *Customer *is > happy ! > > > > > 2011/12/6 Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]> > >> A. Casali >> December 6th, 2011 at 7:09 >> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=3#comment-139978> >> >> 5) Considering the importance of university R&D for the acceptance of >> your technology in terms of certification and authorisations, not to speek >> about the performance improvements that they may bring to your great >> invention, why are you still holding on instead of letting the R&D start? >> >> >> Andrea Rossi >> December 6th, 2011 at 3:55 >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=3#comment-140329> >> >> 5- I am holding nothing, we are already making our R&D with all our >> Consultants, and our Customers are accepting our technology already. They >> don’t care too much who is testing our plants, they care the plants work >> properly, that’s all they want. >> Thank you for your direct and useful questons, >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> >> >> That’s all folks! >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
