Mary Yugo wrote:

My statement has to be falsifiable and it is: simply by Rossi submitting his device to proper independent verification.

I meant your first statement, which is that "there are probably potential methods" of stage magic or faking kilowatt levels of heat.

"Probably potential" phenomena not otherwise named or specified are not admissible evidence in a science-based discussion. Only in theology, as far as I know.

Your second statement about Rossi is correct. No one disputes it.

Let's agree to disagree, and drop the subject. You are welcome to have the last word if you please.

- Jed

Reply via email to