On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> As I have pointed out before, that is an invalid argument. Rossi can >> invalidate the entire line of thought simply by giving an E-cat to a >> university, >> > > Your statement applies to Rossi, not your own argument. *Your argument*has to > be falsifiable. It is not. You are the one invoking fairy godmothers > that no one can ever detect, even in principle. > > Again. That's you. No one can explain the nuclear reaction. You're invoking fairies. The claimed evidence for a nuclear effect is energy density. Rejection of that evidence because the energy density is lower than chemical energy density only requires evidence that chemical energy density is higher (much higher). You don't have a clue what role falsifiability plays in science.
