Am 08.12.2011 19:49, schrieb David Roberson:
Is the entanglement robust enough to survive a long shaky trip? I recall
reading that it is not easy to keep the effect for a long time.
The entanglement of macroscopic objects is probably not stable enough.
It is possible to slow down entangled photons and store them in a
glassfiber loop. This should be stable.
Peter
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: peter.heckert<[email protected]>
To: vortex-l<[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 10:37 am
Subject: Aw: [Vo]:Article - Quantum Entanglement Allows Diamonds to Communicate
---- Original Nachricht ----
on: Michele Comitini<[email protected]>
n: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
atum: 08.12.2011 14:29
etreff: [Vo]:Article - Quantum Entanglement Allows Diamonds to Communicate
http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news-Quantum-Entanglement-Allows-Diamonds
-to-Communicate-120511.aspx?xmlmenuid=51
Researchers have managed to get one small diamond to communicate with
another small diamond utilizing "quantum entanglement," one of the more
mind-blowing features of quantum physics.
he problem is: Entanglement means the diamonds are in connection, but the
ntanglement is destroyed as soon as an external influence kicks in.
herefore this cannot been used for communication.
f one diamond is on mars and another is on earth then two observers one at
arth and one at mars make the same observations without time delay, but they
annot interchange messages.
The two diamonds behave like synchronized clocks.
he mechanism could possibly been used for a precise one-way measurement of
ightspeed.
