On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < [email protected]> wrote:
> Mary yet again proves that there are now 101 ways to say the same thing… * > *** > > we all agree the tests could have been done much better with little effort. > **** > > I think that’s enough repetition that most readers know your opinion on > the issue…**** > > Stop wasting bandwidth and our time unless it’s a point you HAVEN’T made > before. > Rossi's failure to provide adequate data when it is easy to do so really annoys you, does it? I can understand why you dislike being reminded about it. The real waste of bandwidth is the endless repetitious guessing about what Rossi really did and really showed. You are very unlikely to determine it by rehashing the inadequate data from a bad experimental design and from the insufficient and unreliable information Rossi and the observers provided. It's simply GIGO. And Mark, you don't seem to object about bandwidth when people endlessly project what they will do with an E-cat when they get it. Or when they theorize at length *how* it works when nobody can be sure *that* it works. In fact, most people who do this have never seen an E-cat, have no reliable means to project what if anything it will do, and from what we have seen so far, may never have one to do anything with. After all, who has one to play with at the moment except a single anonymous and very possibly mythical "customer"? And we're to believe he is getting 1300 E-cat modules? After the inadequate demonstration of leaky plumbing running at half power connected to a generator that Rossi put on October 28? The customer is to do what with it exactly? The practical application is? That sale story is credible? Jed's well intentioned experiments won't help either unless he gets himself a heat exchanger or properly simulates it with a nice heavy steam-heated copper block on which to move his thermocouples around. That's what Rossi used.
