You are right that Rossi and Defkalion did proof nothing certain. but We have to understand that in the business logic(unscientific) they have no incentive to prove anything to us, the opposite. they just have incentive to prove to their clients, and convince others nothing works, until competitors get cooked.
If I was paranoid, i would say that the few they say is more the proof of a scam, because if it was real they would say nothing... but this reasoning would forget about incoherent motivation especially for Rossi who is passionate. Defkalion and Rossi also have some incentive to communicate, but only to get motivated candidates for tests, but only a few (the most motivated). 2011/12/11 Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> > > Agreed. However Defkalion is even less credible than Rossi. If you > followed their various exorbitant claims on their forum, not a single one > of which has ever been verified, you'd believe them less than you do > Rossi. > >
