Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I found it interesting that Kullander said he would test Rossi's device > only if he could release the results and, apparently, no device had yet > been offered for him to test.
Yup, that's what he said. Google-translation: "Kullander preclude an agreement whereby secrecy around that they have an ECAT in place or that the results may not be shown publicly." That's good. It is fine for Rossi to have secret tests done by corporations or private organizations. But I do not think it is appropriate for a national university to conduct secret tests even if they are fully funded by Rossi or someone else. Secret tests -- or partially secret tests -- in publicly funded institutions should only be done when there are national security issues, or privacy issues. - Jed
