Ransom Wuller, an attorney who hangs out on Ecatnews.com, asked me to ... well here's what he said:
"Oh and Maryyugo, you can do Lewan's second test really easy, take a hose, run 11 liters of water through it into a 6 liter bucket and let me know if your floor gets wet, if so you just proved Rossi had O/I of greater then 3/1. Or do you have the audacity to disagree." I didn't recall which test that was and Wuller provided this link: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166569.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+28+April+2011.pdf I guess Wuller's theory is that if 5 liters of water disappear, they must end up as steam. And if they do, the energy from the heat of vaporization of that water (plus the heat required to heat the whole volume to boiling) is 3X more than the input energy measured by Lewan. Apparently this experiment was discussed in the English version of NyTeknik here: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece I have to admit, I can't follow the PDF report enough to figure out what reservoir 1 and 2 are and what volumes Lewan is measuring. And even if Lewan lost some water along the way, was it necessarily converted to steam? I also notice that Lewan was shown two "naked" E-cats and that the one used for the experiment was completely wrapped in what is presumed to be thick insulation. Far as I know, however, that E-cat was never unwrapped to show it was the same as the others. I'm not sure if that matters but it does leave another unknown. Maybe that E-cat was quite different as in larger than the bare ones and as in "had some chemical or stored energy source in it". So let's see if I understand the claim: 11 liters of water were supplied and 6 were recovered. 5 are unaccounted for and presumed to be steam. But I see that Lewan claimed more than twice that, 11160 grams, as the mass of water evaporated. If I read him right. So where does Wuller's 5 liters come from? Is there another experiment? I'll ask him even though he's sort of abrasive in emails. I guess he's convinced Rossi's machine is real and he doesn't like to be questioned. I wish he'd just participate in the discussion but the question is interesting so I reposted it here. Lewan's calculation of total energy required to vaporize the water seems fine if one assumes it was all vaporized. I don't know how he knew it was. I tried to backtrack through the PDF paper and I get confused about what was done. Anyone know what really happened there or shall I inquire directly of Lewan? I believe he doesn't always follow this list but he does respond to emails. Or can someone point to what I'm missing? I didn't slog through the video but I guess I will when I have time. Maybe he explains it better there.
