On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo wrote: > > So why not take some of the output heat, run it through a simple and > reliable control system, and then return the heat to the input end? > > Then, Rossi could "self sustain" after a brief initial period of > electrical heating, for as long as he liked. > > > He did that! What are you talking about?!? He has made the thing > self-sustain from internally generated heat for 4 hours. It would have > cooled down in 40 min. if it had not been generating heat. > > Rossi has done *exactly* what you demand. It seems you will not take > "yes" for an answer. > Rossi ran a nuclear reactor for four hours with a claimed six month capability and I am supposed to be ecstatic? There is nothing in any Rossi device's design that routes heat BACK from output to input via a controller. That was my suggestion in response to someone suggesting that the reactor needs to be kept warm at its input. Even Rossi hasn't claimed to do what I suggested he do! Rossi has not explained why he needs a "safety" heater which in the original E-cat can only HEAT the COOLANT. He has never explained why there is a relatively short time limit for self-sustaining running. None of that makes the slightest sense and it never has. You seem to be writing his script for him now and you seem to be making stuff up.
