Chris Zell wrote: "Once the emergence is established, there will be evidence of public grief by various enviromentalists and climate change activists. Only a few will observe what this teaches about their real motives were"
I'm not having a go at Chris directly here but he repeats a common theme. I'm getting a bit sick and tired of assorted flavours of self interested political ideologies ascribing black motives to environmentalists and attempting to traduce them by hoodwinking the views of the too gullible public. I won't deny that within the broad spectrum of people that would describe themselves as environmentalists are a minority those with peculiar motivations, as there probably is in any defined group, but to take isolated pieces of ambiguous evidence and extrapolate from the exceptions to suggest that those are the rule is just deceitful. There are real and obvious reasons why true environmentalists would be concerned if everyone got access to vast amounts of energy because of what they might do with it. Simplistic views that energy=good, more energy=better, most energy=best are a bit one dimensional in outlook. Nick Palmer On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it Blogspot - Sustainability and stuff according to Nick Palmer http://nickpalmer.blogspot.com
