On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Other than Talbot Chubb every researcher I have discussed this with > believes most of the claims. >
Not many on record though. It will be interesting if the ecat comes to nothing, to see how they will rationalize their beliefs in the claims. Because the absence of a real commercial product in a few years would all but prove the claims wrong. Probably conspiracy theories will abound. > See McKubre's recent talk: > > http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm > > As I said here, I agree with his characterization of Rossi and Rossi's > business strategy. To reiterate, McKubre began by calling Rossi a > "dodgy character" but technically brilliant. He discusses Rossi's business > plans. He says "Rossi is the master of misdirection." His business strategy > is also brilliant. He is keeping his results ambiguous to "avoid > competition and the evil eye of the DoE." > Can results be ambiguous and irrefutable at the same time?
