It is possible to both manipulate and respond to electromagnetic radiation just by ajusting the shape and number of a collection of atoms.
To understand this, consider the properties of a newly developed tool of quantum mechanics called Quantum dots. Quantum dots are very, very tiny particles on the order of a nanometer in size. They are composed of a hundred to a thousand atoms. These materials can be made from any number of pure elements such as nickel, gold, or copper, or a compound, such as nickel or copper hydride. Color of visible light is well known to be influenced by particle size in both quantum dots and nanoparticles. Quantum dots are of much interest for the other unusual properties that they possess. These other properties include electrical and nonlinear optical properties. These unique properties of nano sized particles are partly the result of the unusually high surface to volume ratios for these particles, as many as one-third of the atoms are on the surface of the particle. As a result electrons and "holes" (holes result when an electron moves away from a bond, leaving a positively charged particle) are confined in a limited space inside the cluster. So it’s possible to ionize and quantize a metal into long lived cooper pairs of protons just by making the size of a particle small. Quantum dots can emit or absorb light at a particular wavelength at great efficiency in relation to its size (atom count), the smaller the dot, the higher the energy of the emitted/absorbed light. This ability to create dots that emit a rainbow of colors just by the adjustment of their size suggests that they could be used to transform EMF radiation. Quantum dots do not degrade as rapidly so it is possible to make light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with long service lives from quantum dots. But segregation of atoms is not restricted to the size of their physical aggregation. Aggregation can also be done by quantum mechanical characteristics. I believe that the detailed study of the Ni/H reaction suggests that we can now aggregate matter by not only particle size but by coherent zones of entangled quantum mechanical characteristics to form coherent pseudo quantum dot ensembles which can extend over physical boundaries and include various materials. It is this wondrous property of matter that can downshift EMF from the gamma ray frequencies to the thermal frequencies, delay completed nuclear reactions in indefinitely suspended quantum superposition states and make nuclear reactions sensitive to heat. * * On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:06 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > **I agree with you that the details probably contain what we desire if we > can read them properly. It is apparent that heat is one of the major > factors involved in the reaction rate and we must understand why this is > so. I have requested on many occasions for Rossi or Defkalion to release a > graph plotting the energy release of a small volume of material as a > function of its internal temperature but it has not been delivered. One > day I hope to see this chart. > > It might be that the cosmic rays just begin the process of storing energy > since they allow the material to overcome the coulomb barrier at any > temperature. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2011 3:56 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cosmic Trigger? > > Cosmic ray background is random but essentially a continuous condition > on the time scale of nuclear active site generation. > > Both the Rossi and Piantelli reactors are subject to run away burn up > conditions when the temperature of the hydrogen and nickel rises above a > critical temperature. > > The essentially continuous Cosmic ray background cannot explain how and > why this condition could occur. > > If heat is a triggering condition, such a triggering mechanism would > explain how reactor burn up could happen. > > Details, details, details…it’s all in the details. > > If one assumes that the Ni/H reaction occurs as described in detail by > both Rossi and Piantelli, many amazing and astounding quantum mechanical > clockwork implications must be drawn. > > Such implications might one day open a doorway to the stars; a good reason > to look into the details and implications of this technology with great > vigor. > > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Horace Heffner <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: >> >> Horace:**** >> The problem I see with some kind of outside trigger is that the “turn-on” >> of excess heat would occur randomly… how does one control when that cosmic >> ray or muon will initiate the reaction? In one of the demos, it appeared >> to turn on at a specific temperature.**** >> -mark**** >> >> >> Cosmic ray background is random but essentially a continuous condition on >> the time scale of nuclear active site generation. Nuclear active sites >> capable of chain reactions are not dense. They are islands which >> apparently grow with time, otherwise events many orders of magnitude larger >> than 10^4 fusions would occur. The size of craters would not be nearly >> uniform. The cross section of such islands to cosmic rays etc. apparently >> grows slowly, and is affected by temperature, and external conditions and >> forms of stimulation. This is one reason LENR can not be expected to be >> useful for nuclear explosives. Triggers in the form of cosmic rays and >> other background radiation are constantly present in the environment. The >> active sites have to be generated on demand. Practical LENR is inherently >> a dynamic process. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Horace Heffner >> http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ >> >> >> >> >> >
