Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:

> Aseptic technique may be imperfect in many places but hundreds of
> thousands of death due to negligence?  Cite please.  And not some whacko
> website, please.
>
>
> http://www.safepatientproject.org/2007/05/cdc_publishes_sobering_stats_o.html
> In a newly released study <http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/hai.html> (1),
> the CDC estimates that there are 4.5 hospital infections for every 100
> patient admissions and nearly 100,000 deaths from hospital infection.
>

Thanks.

See also:

Lavate vestras manus. Handwashing Liaison Group.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281522/

Hand hygiene—the case for evidence-based education

Among the priorities identified for the National Health Service (NHS) are
reductions in hospital-acquired infection and in antimicrobial resistance1.
These are to be achieved by improved surveillance, optimal antibiotic
prescribing and strengthening of basic infection control procedures such as
handwashing. According to recent figures2,3, hospital acquired infection
affects 1 in 11 inpatients, carries a 13% mortality and lengthens stay by a
factor of 2.5. The extra cost to the NHS is nearly £3000 per patient, and
the total annual cost is nearly £1 billion. Between 15% and 30% of
hospital-acquired infection is considered preventable . . .


How American Health Care Killed My Father

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/09/how-american-health-care-killed-my-father/7617/

There are thousands more references from the U.S. NIH, the CDC and every
other major heath agency.

- Jed

Reply via email to