To be, or not to be, that is the question: Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind to suffer The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune, Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles, And by opposing end them: to die, to sleep No more; and by a sleep, to say we end The heart-ache, and the thousand Natural shocks That Flesh is heir to? 'Tis a consummation Devoutly to be wished. To die to sleep, To sleep, perchance to Dream; Ay, there's the rub, For in that sleep of death, what dreams may come, .... The undiscovered Country, from whose bourn No Traveller returns, Puzzles the will, And makes us rather bear those ills we have, Than fly to others that we know not of. Thus Conscience does make Cowards of us all.
So there we have it, and let the proponents of this speculation speak their mind. If the opponents have the courage to refute the claims, they must first rebuke the central argument made with the claim itself. The proponents of overunity claim that more energy may be manifested in a load, then the energy input required to ordinarily power the load. To refresh our memory and methodology the claim itself is placed under review; The claim of the input power is the use of three phase AC to be rectified to be manifested as a DC current across a load; the losses involved with that rectification not to be included in that load; and the reflection that the DC load has no power factor correction involved,(where the reactive power measurement of DC voltage times DC amperage is equal to the true power output.) but the AC input may have those considerations introduced. Now we immediately proceed with the following argument. For simplicity we assume three phase 1A rms currents at 120 degree phase angles are inputed to a DC load, after the necessary rectifications take place with their appropriate losses involved. At the peak amperage of any of these signals we find 1.4A, where at the same time we find another two 1.4 A currents at half their peak value, or .7 A, in opposite polarity. If the losses of the rectification system are miniscule we should find just below 2.8A on the rectified DC current for a cost of three 1A rms meter read currents as the three phase AC inputs. This statement precludes the fact that almost ALL the voltage across the DC load will be there % wise with respect to the much smaller voltages across the diodes of the rectification system that enable these collective currents to exist across the load. Now we institute a fantastic prognosis called resonant current ballasting whereby the resistance of the load is ballasted by a middle man agent where identical reactances in balance are also placed in series with that load. Ordinarily with ordinary ballast laws this means that ONLY HALF THE CURRENT SHOULD THEN REACH THE LOAD. http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/6558719847/ Binary Resonant Tank circuit showing pathway of doubled reactive current for load substitution. Here's one of the first videos on the subject where a .3A reactive current input is changed to 1.13 A, by the summation of splitting the individual reactive currents of .5A and .64A where it is obvious that the opposite reactive currents sum to unity showing 1.13A along the common pathway made with opposing travel paths shared in unity. http://youtu.be/f85IUR0XEcw The ferrite heating demo was not made in that video. The REASON that .3A amps is less then the ACTUAL reactive amperage circulation is that the circuit undergoes the resonant rise of amperage in a (60 hz)tank circuit. Now when we INCLUDE a resistor as a load within that tank circuit, we no longer obtain that doubling of amperage within the circuit. But as this thing gets more progressively complicated, WE MAY STILL OBTAIN CURRENT IN EXCESS OF WHAT WOULD OCCUR IF THAT CURRENT WERE NOT BALLASTED BY THESE MEANS. Near 1:20 in the video we see that 8.9 volts goes in through the ballasting process, noted as 12 volts variac input in the video, which means the 4/1 step up transformer at best should deliver 48 volts if it were not ballasted by these means. Yet the transformer itself shows 143.5 secondary volts, about four times the normal value. But bear in mind this means nothing at all, we have only made a ferromagnetic transformer act at four times its normal step up ratio, by use of this ballasting. This of course COULD have practical applications if we used it to power the arc gap in a tesla coil, but other derivations of principles have been used in my other work involving the completely wireless tesla coil that uses no transformer whatsover and instead uses resonant rise of voltage to accomplish the needed objectives. Now let us return to our central argument. Suppose that we have procurred a 2.8A DC load output, where using the normal processes of three phase rectification we find that this takes 1 A rms currents into the three phases to make this possible. Now suppose that we accomplish the same objective of output DC energy; BUT NOW WE ONLY USE .6A RMS INPUT CURRENT TO ACHIEVE THE SAME RESULT. IS THIS OVER UNITY BY DEFINITION OR NOT, OR IS IT MORONIC! Consider the following as this debate is already seven years old, but at the time I did not understand how to clarify the argument... http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/6558831845/ 3/4 inch ferrite glow @ 21.3 volts @ 3.8 A stator lines input/ 31.8 DC volts @ 3.6A output from teslafy SP file; May 14, 2004 If another power input of 32 VDC is substituted, such as battery or ferromagnetic step down transformer; it will no longer be able to power the process and things will go back to near room temperature. http://youtu.be/1RKZCPSvoQk 2.8 DCA & 3.6 DCA 3/8ths width ferrite incandescence with corresponding 3 phase AC inputs. The top red meters are stator line amperages and the middle grey meters the phase amperages. In three phase for a delta delivery, the stator lines contain 1.71 or (sq rt 3) times the phase amperages. Yet at 1:41 in the videos the sum of the stator lines @ 8.54A EQUALS the sum of the phase amperages. Thus for this example using summed amperages of the phases themselves; ~70% more current exists as the effect of RESONANT RISE OF AMPERAGE. It is these outer delta AC currents that become the source of the DC currents across the ferrite by intervening rectifications of the three phase AC source currents. (in honor of my brother who died in his sleep/ for in that sleep what dreams may come) Conditioned Ferrite Heat Release http://youtu.be/hRiNxkdWD8U HDN Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
