I'm reading his papers and I don't understand one thing: 1.What triggers the 4D/TSC? It looks like an ordinary configuration of D in palladium... 2.Why does he use a value that is so precise "1.4007fs" to the 4D/TSC reach the minimum state. His calculations are approximations and even if they weren't the data used in the initial state like, proton mass, electron mass, bohr radius, have less precision. It sounds odd for an experienced scientist to do these things.
2011/12/27 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> > At 01:35 AM 12/27/2011, Charles Hope wrote: > > > On Dec 26, 2011, at 22:10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Then there is that pesky Coulomb barrier. What I found, though, was >> that there was ample opinion among quantum physicists that it was possible >> that the unexplored conditions of condensed matter just might provide some >> pathway around that, some kind of tunneling or alternate reaction. Recent >> work has actually predicted fusion from a physical arrangement of deuterium >> that *might* be present, quite rarely, in highly loaded PdD. That's using, >> apparently, standard quantum mechanics, but that theory is as yet >> unverified. >> >> Oh? Citation, please? >> > > Akito Takahashi, multiple publications, going back into the early 1990s. > For example, see "Study on 4D/Tetrahedral Symmetric Condensate Condensation > Motion by Non-Linear Langevin Equation," Akito Takahashi and Norio > Yabuuchi, in Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Sourcebook, ed Marwan and Krivit, > American Chemical Society and Oxford University Press, 2008. > > See also the Storms review, which mentions this work, "Status of cold > fusion (2010)," Naturwissenschaften, October 2010. For abstract, see > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/**pubmed/20838756<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838756>, > for a preprint, see http://www.lenr-canr.org/** > acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf<http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf> > > As to the opinion of quantum physicists on the possibility of there being > unknown effects in the solid state, there was a recent revision of a > textbook on solid state nuclear models, and it has a section on LENR, and > it turns out that the author had written something pointing to the lack of > "impossibility" back around 1990. I went around and around all this on > Wikipedia. Bottom line: don't bother me with facts, I'm a grad student and > I know quantum physics, and it says it's impossible. > > Of course, it doesn't. > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
