On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Horace Heffner <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Dec 27, 2011, at 9:05 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Horace, >> >> Thanks for the comment. >> >> What is needed are some toy models with some simple simulations. >> I will check out your theory. >> Do you believe any "new physics" is required >> - or does standard QM suffice? >> I am getting pretty boggled by the complexity of it all. >> >> LP >> > > > I think it is presently not computationally feasible to analyze the > deflated state using QM. This is due to the extreme relativistic effects > combined with magnetic effects. > I'm not sure why quantum mechanics couldn't analyze this state, but I don't believe that the concept of deflation is mainstream physics, is it? Also, what are your criticisms of Takahashi?
