No, Takashi used the weak force in the sense of finding a cross section for the reaction electron proton, but he laid a very harsh criticism on WL theory and make it clear the difference between the approaches. In fact, he didn't take WL seriously.
2011/12/30 <[email protected]> > Daniel, you may be correct. > I do not know. > > However, both Akito Takahashi and Hideo Kozima may regard W-L viable. > See -- "Second “Cold Fusion” Theorist Cites Widom-Larsen Theory" > > http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/23/second-cold-fusion-theorist-cites-widom-larsen-theory/ > > Takahashi appears to be one of the founding members of the Cold Fusion > Energy, Inc. (CFEI) consortium - along with Hagelstein, McKubre, > Storms,... > See -- http://www.cfeis.com/ > > Daniel Rocha wrote: > > I started with stage 2 of negation and went to 1... > > > > 2011/12/30 <[email protected]> > > > >> Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF > >> dogmatists ironic. > >> > >> > >> > http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cold-fusioneers-new-ploy-ad-hoc-redefinition-of-technical-term-fusiondec-30-2011 > >> > >> Too bad it's human nature to form opposing-warring factions. > >> Perhaps some relic of Darwinian selection? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Rocha - RJ > > [email protected] > > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
