You can find it here, a google translation, which is what I used: http://www.ecatplanet.net/content.php?142-Frontiers-of-Cold-Fusion-Eng
2011/12/30 <[email protected]> > Again, I am not sure. > > Looking at the slide on p.105 at JCF12 Abstracts at-- > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/JCF12/JCF12ExtendedAbstracts.pdf > -- I see the reaction "59Ni + e- ----> 59Co + v + Q" > I cannot read Japanese, but this looks like a "heavy electron" capture, > but that is just a guess. Pardon if I misinterpreted. > > Daniel Rocha wrote: > > No, Takashi used the weak force in the sense of finding a cross section > > for the reaction electron proton, but he laid a very harsh criticism on > WL > > theory and make it clear the difference between the approaches. In fact, > > he didn't take WL seriously. > > > > 2011/12/30 <[email protected]> > > > >> Daniel, you may be correct. > >> I do not know. > >> > >> However, both Akito Takahashi and Hideo Kozima may regard W-L viable. > >> See -- "Second “Cold Fusion” Theorist Cites Widom-Larsen Theory" > >> > >> > http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/23/second-cold-fusion-theorist-cites-widom-larsen-theory/ > >> > >> Takahashi appears to be one of the founding members of the Cold Fusion > >> Energy, Inc. (CFEI) consortium - along with Hagelstein, McKubre, > >> Storms,... > >> See -- http://www.cfeis.com/ > >> > >> Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> > I started with stage 2 of negation and went to 1... > >> > > >> > 2011/12/30 <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF > >> >> dogmatists ironic. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cold-fusioneers-new-ploy-ad-hoc-redefinition-of-technical-term-fusiondec-30-2011 > >> >> > >> >> Too bad it's human nature to form opposing-warring factions. > >> >> Perhaps some relic of Darwinian selection? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Daniel Rocha - RJ > >> > [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Rocha - RJ > > [email protected] > > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
