The first topic of discussion with the conservative oriented, employer
friendly Kiplinger News Letter, published Jan 6, 2012, was the topic of
Energy.  It was fascinating and unusually lengthy discussion on energy, too.
I've hi-lighted in red what I thought were some surprising observations:

 

****************************************************************************
*******

ENERGY:

 

While global oil supplies grow shakier. most recently in light of saber
rattling by Iran. U.S. and Canadian oil output is surging.

 

Along with natural gas and biofuels. 

 

It will fill 80% of U.S. fuel needs by 2016, compared with 68% this year and
just 50% in 2005.

 

[Personal comment: Just in time for the next presidential election.]

 

Driving the boom: Vast new oil discoveries in N.D., Texas, Colo. and Ohio,
as well as Canada, and cost-effective drilling technology breakthroughs for
tapping oil in hard-to-reach shale formations. 

 

Huge natural gas deposits in Ohio, Texas, La. and elsewhere, many of them
near big oil plays. Though decried by environmentalists, fracking, a method
for extracting gas, will unlock decades of supply, not only for fuel, but
for other needs, too.

 

Also, the continuing march of biofuels, which are becoming a larger part of
the energy mix, despite the end of federal tax credits for them. 

All this lowers the risk of fuel shortages, should foreign oil shipments be
suddenly curtailed.

 

It won't affect gasoline prices very much. What motorists pay will continue
to hinge on global supply-and-demand trends. Though fuel consumption is
heading down in the U.S... China, India and many other parts of the world
are soaking up more as their economies expand. They'll press prices upward
even as supplies grow.

 

New finds will make the U.S. a net exporter of natural gas by 2016 or so, a
welcome U-turn from recent scenarios that had the nation poised to be a
major importer. In fact, Houston-based Cheniere Energy is retrofitting its
liquefied natural gas import terminals for export. Other refiners are likely
to follow in its footsteps.

 

Still, lots of natural gas to go around for domestic users... good news for
utilities, producers of plastics and fertilizer plus other energy-intensive
firms. They'll pay less for the stuff than their foreign rivals.

 

What could undermine rising output? A sustained drop in global oil prices...
not likely in the face of rising world demand...would lessen drilling
incentives.

 

[Personal comment: Obviously, if Rossi & related competition claims pan out
in the near future, that would initiate a sustained and permanent drop in
global oil prices, despite rising world demand. Granted, It may not happen
immediately, but perhaps within 5 - 10 years a permanent appreciable drop in
fossil fuel prices would begin to be noticed world-wide. I have repeatedly
attempted to contact the Kiplinger editorial staff to this possibility -
warning them to have their clients keep an eye on their fossil fuel
portfolios. They have consistently ignored my responses, never even
acknowledging my attempts to contact them. This is unusual behavior on
behalf of the Kiplinger editorial staff. Typically they are much more
responsive. Historically speaking, I've received replies from the editorial
staff, including replies when I told them about STEORN's zany activities
years ago. I discovered they were very much aware of what STEORN was up to.
and BlackLight Power as well. If the editorial staff had been aware of those
folks, it seems logical for me to assume that they have to be aware of Rossi
as well. Nevertheless, the fact that they continue to ignore my responses
baffles me to no end.]

 

And opposition from environmentalists, citing risks of groundwater
pollution. Blocking Canada's carbon-intense oil sands projects is a
particular focus for them.

 

But in the end, economic forces will win out. Canada's 170 billion barrels
of known oil reserves and the U.S.' big shale gas fields are too valuable
not to exploit, giving America a surer grip on its energy future while
reducing the need to import

 

****************************************************************************
*******

 

Final personal thoughts on the matter: As you can see, the Kiplinger letter
doesn't seem to put much stock in environmental issues stopping "progress".
With the said, I suspect many on the staff may be sympathetic to
environmental concerns, at least to a degree. This, I garnered from previous
responses I received in private email. To their credit they do their best to
report the news in an objective fashion as they see it, not how they wish
the news would actually turn out to be. Occasionally, some of the staff
hinted to me how idiotic Washington politics can be at times in the face of
real facts.

 

Still, I find it hard to believe they haven't at least acknowledged my
repeated warnings of what Rossi could do to the portfolios of many who might
be heavily invested in fossil fuels. The lack of a response baffles me.
Perhaps, like many news gathering agencies, they have been affected by the
economy and are now understaffed. I dunno.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

www.OrionWorks.com

www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to