Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does anyone seriously think that in the foreseeable future, the limiting > feature of making energy by nickel-hydrogen fusion is going to be the > supply of nickel? No, we do not think that, because we understand something about the reaction. Again, you are ignoring what I wrote. You are missing the point, because you are so caught up in making cynical, stupid attacks and snide comments. Please shut up and listen. Let me repeat: When you contact important people in industry and government, the first thing they ask is often: "Is there enough nickel to do this?" That is a legitimate question from someone who knows nothing at all about cold fusion. So, we need to have the numbers on this. We need a good answer. The first thing they asked about the Fleischmann-Pons experiments was: "Is there enough palladium to do this?" Fleischmann answered: "No, there isn't." He said that at MIT and many other places. I think he was right, as I said in my book. > Are there not *vastly* more important issues they could address? No, there are not. This is a central issue. It comes up all the time. I have been dealing with cold fusion for most of its history, and this has always been front and center in people's minds. - Jed
