On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Aussie Guy E-Cat > > > Why you put a negative spin on this is beyond me? It is the best news you > could have reported. IT WORKS!!!!! > > Works, yes ... for a short time. But is it cost effective? - not on this > planet. Will it make a dent in fossil fuel use? - not on this planet, at > least not as it stands now. > > Let's be clear, I want to see this technology, Ni-H, succeed more than > anyone and by anyone, but I am not a shill for AR, and I hope you are not. > He may have succeeded in raising the level of consciousness that Ni-H > works, > but the invention goes back to Thermacore, and whether Rossi can take that > through to fulfillment is in doubt. > > What is the real value of a $2 million device, or a $2000 device, that > works > for 24 hours, produces about $1000 worth of heat and then goes quiescent? > Rossi's (and Defkalion's) claims were always that their devices run unattended for a minimum of six months without refueling or other attention. In fact Rossi repeatedly said they run much longer but that he would prefer the six month interval for safety reasons until he got to know how they age in the field. If that was a lie, what else do you think Rossi lied about? If he lied about that, why believe anything he said?
