Rossi has stated the customer is a US organization engaged in military research, the first 1 MW plant was at the customers site in the US and that he and others have attended to install the plant. Later he stated, he, the customer's engineer and NI are working on the advanced control system and they have made excellent progress.


On 1/15/2012 9:17 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Hi AG,

Jones gave a lot of hints in his answer to my questions 4:30 hours earlier. The customers name seems to start with "N", is an organization in Brussel, Rossi also once mentioned the name in the context of the 28th october 1MW test while talking about the "Colonel" (my guess, the name has four letters and ends with "O" ;)).


Interesting info. So you are confirming Rossi DID ship the 1 MW reactor to his customer. That it did not work over extended periods is to be expected with new technology. If this has happened it says 2 things:

Rossi did ship the reactor to his customer. Excellent news
The reactor did work but not as the customer expected. Also excellent news as it does work. Rossi is working to rectify any issues. Again excellent news as Rossi is working to meet the customers needs.

So the customer is real, the device works but not as reliably as the customer expects and Rossi is working with NI to meet the customer's expectations.

This is a real world result. This is an excellent result. This is product development in the flesh.

So Mr. Beene now that you have started talking, who is the customer?


On 1/15/2012 2:23 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Why read something else into this? LOL. You must be joking.

Because Rossi spoke it, for one thing - and because it is misleading for
another, just short of complete dishonesty.

You should know this, AG - if you talk to Rossi as much as you claim; and if
he is being straight with you.

Rossi did deliver, yes, but "the customer" has sent it back.

Rossi's spin: "we will add controls". Only Rossi has NOT even admitted that
it has been returned. That would sound too much like failure.

Customers complaint: *did not work over extended periods*, so of no value for intended use, despite the fact that it does work for short periods. Thus
we sent it back to Bologna.

Reply via email to