Axil, It may not just be the control system. If the reactor actually works (questionable) unless it is designed correctly with proper thermal/heat transfer surface, etc. it may not be able to get rid of the heat properly if the reaction hits a sweet spot. W & L gave a low estimate of 4000 x chemical (conservatively down from 8M x chemical potential) on one of their slides and that could potentially be alot of heat to get rid of in a short period of time if the right conditions are met. Just a lump of powder in a reactor chamber would have a very hard time transferring that energy without overheating/melting. Co-deposition of the reactants onto a heat transfer surface sounds like a good solution to me.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Until the NI control system is developed, Rossi is the only operator > qualified to keep the E-Cat within operational limits through manual > control. > > > > Because of improper temperature control due to operational inexperience > and/or ineptness, another untrained outside tester will either cause the > E-Cat to flame out or melt down. Rossi may change his mind about letting a > third party operator get his hand on the controls of the E-Cat for demos > when the moron/snake proof automated control system is debugged and made > operational. > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Terry, >>> >>> I find it difficult to believe these guys would not be able to get Rossi >>> on a Skype connection, especially as they had Dick Smith's $200k riding on >>> the call. >>> >> >> Perhaps Rossi did not want to be found. Dick Smith's $200K was contingent >> on an independent test. Rossi does not want independent tests as he has >> said many times. Where are the tests promised by the Universities of >> Bologna and Upsala? Last year they were fervently promised to come >> "soon". Now, they are "not needed". One can only venture a guess >> about the reasons why, LOL. >> > >
