Axil when you say "Here is another explanation about the confusion between rydberg atoms and the hydrino has happened." And then site my reply to Alain you are misreading my reply. I never compared the hydrino to a Rydberg atom - I compared it to an "inverse" Rydberg atom, The paper you site Covers the generation of Rydberg atom via electric fields - these are oversized atoms not undersized and are not a function of suppression which is what gas atoms experience when loaded into the lattice of a skeletal cat or nano powder. Casimir geometry limits the number of atoms that can fit parallel between the plates and would exclude most of the larger Rydberg atoms.
On Sat Jan 21, 2012 Axil wrote [snip] Metastable Argon Atoms and the Portable Rydberg Generator: http://www.jgurian.com/research/articles/jgurian_thesis.pdf Noble gases produce Rydberg atoms when excited in an electric field. The production of Rydberg atoms is an critical and prerequisite channel in the production of hydrogen ions and subsequent coherence of proton pairs. Excitation of noble gases is another way to produce Rydberg atoms in a hydrogen envelop. See the aforrefernced pdf for more details. Here is another explanation about the confusion between rydberg atoms and the hydrino has happened. On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:00 PM, francis <[email protected]> wrote: > Alain,**** > > Nice catch! Yes Argon and other noble gases are claimed to > be catalysts with respect to the hydrino - even if other researchers call > them inverse Rydberg or fractional hydrogen. Gas loading into a rigid > catalytic metal lattice is already more vigorous than wet electrolytic > cells and I would suggest that there may be a similar increase in vigor > when a gas catalyst is introduced into hydrogen when loading into a metal > lattice. I have always contended that the active geometry can even form > temporarily in a totally gaseous environment similar to sonoluminesce only > the flattened meniscus is a conductive gas instead of a liquid that traps > and forms the fractional hydrogen bubble. The sonoluminescence and gaseous > equivalent are self destructive and energy must be used to constantly > re-generate the geometry but this idea of loading both the hydrogen and a > catalyzing noble gas into the lattice may be the best of both worlds! I can > imagine both gases becoming fractional and then the fractional hydrogen > becoming further fractionalized by the fractional noble gas.**** > > Fran ****
