On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Hotmail <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > Shaun, you are in error. I have examined your pictures and like Mary, I > do not see the significance of the goop you are referring to. >
I didn't say I didn't see the significance-- I do. I am not that good at pattern recognition. I was asking for assistance in interpreting the pattern that suggests where the thermocouple head was and the trail of its withdrawal. I think I see it better now but not as well as Shaun does. I have little doubt that the thermocouple placement in the October 6 experiment was a calculated deception on the part of Rossi. Probably, it was one of several, including one inside the large E-cat, which created an illusion of excess power. Why else would Rossi change the design with almost no increase in power output from a device ten times or more the size of the original? Levi's notoriously undocumented and unrepeated experiment provided probably the largest power density surge of any E-cat ever claimed -130 kW, if you believe it, in a core about the size of a tennis ball. It's been downhill in power density every since. That's Rossi-progress, I guess.
