On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:35 AM, John Milstone <[email protected]>wrote:
> Perhaps. I don't see what this theory offers that makes it more likely > than Rossi is a con man. > It offers that there is no evidence Rossi ever showed a working device. No evidence of proper tests anywhere-- EVER. Yet he told DOD they had been tested by the University of New Hampshire. That's how he got the contract. That makes him a lying con man if no such tests occurred. I wonder if his original proposal still exists anywhere we could see it?
