Who supplied and positioned the thermocouple. If it was Rossi (as Mats Lewan claims was true for every test), then I don't believe it. Rossi has way too much to gain, and way too much history of lying and cheating for me to place any faith in anything he supplied to test his gadget.
You have repeatedly used Lewan's statement that it *was* very hot to justify your claims of nuclear reactions. As long as the temperature was measured by someone credible (i.e. NOT Rossi) and with trustworthy equipment (i.e. NOT supplied by Rossi) then I would accept that. But as long as Rossi gets to run tests, they are worthless. If he ever allows his device to be tested as a black box by someone credible, such as the University of Bologna, I'll be happy to reconsider my opinion of the E-Cat. But I'm pretty sure that Rossi won't ever do that. And all of your anonymous "experts" and "secret" tests mean nothing. ________________________________ From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> To: John Milstone <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 5:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog John Milstone <[email protected]> wrote: If the water was at 5 to 10 bars, it could easily be heated to 150 - 180 C. in the preheating process. At that point, being wrapped up in that massive insulation blanket, it would stay over 100 C for hours. There was a TC in the reactor. It measured over 100 deg C, but not 150 to 180 deg C. Also, in that scenario, the surface temperature of the reactor would be very hot when the internal temperature reached 180 deg C,then it would gradually cool down. That is not in evidence. The surface temperature was measured several times. It did not vary much. - Jed
