On 23/01/2012 12:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >
As I noted, the temperature was measured by Lewan.
Who is now known to have covered up multiple Rossi lies and to have accepted the BS Tout bead placement in the 6 Oct test. So please explain why Lewans has credibility in your eyes?
Are you saying Lewans supplied the thermocouples and data logger, placed them HIMSELF and then independent to Rossi's gear, recorded the temperatures? As far as I can find out, that never happened so why suggest it did?
We now know Rossi is a self admitted liar, from the 6 Oct images we know he placed the Tout bead to create an artificially higher temperature than reality.
Lewans, Levi, Focardi and probably others never called Rossi out on his "It's Gone" lie nor on the "I went there to install it" lie. Where is their credibility now? To me it does not exist. They are just more Rossi flamed and burnt at the stake causalities in Rossi's campaign of continual lies and false or the "Cat ate it" (the missing 18 hour Levi data) lack of data. Plus not one scrap of independently Ecat tested data. Total vacuum of real data here. And vacuums suck.
There is NO credibility here. NONE. This is nothing more than a very shaky house of cards, built on crumbling foundations of lies and false data.
Shaun
