I did not say anything about fraud or criminal, you did. The site has been that way for a few months, just more absurdity from a company ready to change the world of energy...
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Craig Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Having a crap website is not a guarentee of criminal or fraudulent > behaviour, otherwise half the internet would be guilty. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. > From: Chemical Engineer <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, January 23, 2012 1:14 pm > To: [email protected] > > The Amperngo website contact info does not even function, the email > address listed is disabled. It is just some shell company website, pretty > hokey... > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > [email protected] > (ultimately generated from [email protected]) > SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected] > >: > host ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM <http://aspmx.l.google.com/> [74.125.81.26]: > 550 5.2.1 The email account that you tried to reach is disabled. > xb3si2801930obb.114 > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Craig Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's a fact that Ampenergo have not complained about anything so I fail >> to see the relevance. Pure specualtion again. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. >> From: Mary Yugo <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, January 23, 2012 12:07 pm >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Shaun, >>> Picking data apart is one thing, but when you choose to state, AS A FACT, >>> that Rossi is knowingly working with Millin, you damn well better have >>> direct evidence (e.g., a contract with Rossi's sig, or video of Rossi >>> interacting with Millin). >>> >> >> I am also not clear on whether someone is taking money (or was proposing >> to) for Rossi or for themselves. It's pretty nasty either way but one of >> the ways doesn't implicate Rossi. Rossi did get money from Ampenergo >> --that's a fact as per an interview in NyTeknik. And it was substantial. >> How many other people and places he got money from, I know of no evidence >> about but I betcha it's many and plenty most likely. >> >> NyTeknik interview about Ampenergo: >> >> http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece >> From the article: >> >> "*How much do you pay for the agreement?* >> Cassarino: Unfortunately that’s confidential. >> *Have you paid anything to Rossi yet?* >> Cassarino: Yes we have. >> *How much?* >> Cassarino: Let’s put it like this, it was an important piece of the >> equation. >> *Have you searched new funding?* >> Cassarino: Absolutely, we are in current conversations with some very >> large companies here in the US and South America, some investment >> companies, because it’s not just a technology we’re creating in the >> industry here. There are a lot of pieces that really need to come together >> to build this matrix, lots of pieces of the puzzle that need to have some >> strategic thinking done, as how we transition into a new energy source. >> That’s what makes this very exciting. *So you know there’s never enough >> money to make everything happen.* >> (sorry, formatting of the quote may be off and WYS is not WYG)... gmail >> is weird that way. If there is emphasis on "there's never enough money" >> it's mine. >> >> >> >
