Sorry, but you said it was a "shell company" and suggested it was "hokey". So that does not tend to suggest that you think it is a legitimate company. The implication here is that there is no real company behind the website.
Please clarify what you meant then.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage.
From: Chemical Engineer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, January 23, 2012 1:29 pm
To: [email protected]
I did not say anything about fraud or criminal, you did.The site has been that way for a few months, just more absurdity from a company ready to change the world of energy...On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Craig Brown <[email protected]> wrote:Having a crap website is not a guarentee of criminal or fraudulent behaviour, otherwise half the internet would be guilty.-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage.From: Chemical Engineer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, January 23, 2012 1:14 pm
To: [email protected]
The Amperngo website contact info does not even function, the email address listed is disabled. It is just some shell company website, pretty hokey...This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[email protected]
(ultimately generated from [email protected])
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
host ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM [74.125.81.26]: 550 5.2.1 The email account that you tried to reach is disabled. xb3si2801930obb.114
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Craig Brown <[email protected]> wrote:It's a fact that Ampenergo have not complained about anything so I fail to see the relevance. Pure specualtion again.-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage.From: Mary Yugo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, January 23, 2012 12:07 pm
To: [email protected]
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote:
Shaun,
Picking data apart is one thing, but when you choose to state, AS A FACT,
that Rossi is knowingly working with Millin, you damn well better have
direct evidence (e.g., a contract with Rossi's sig, or video of Rossi
interacting with Millin).
I am also not clear on whether someone is taking money (or was proposing to) for Rossi or for themselves. It's pretty nasty either way but one of the ways doesn't implicate Rossi. Rossi did get money from Ampenergo --that's a fact as per an interview in NyTeknik. And it was substantial. How many other people and places he got money from, I know of no evidence about but I betcha it's many and plenty most likely.
NyTeknik interview about Ampenergo:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece From the article:
"How much do you pay for the agreement?Cassarino: Unfortunately that’s confidential.Have you paid anything to Rossi yet?Cassarino: Yes we have.How much?Cassarino: Let’s put it like this, it was an important piece of the equation.Have you searched new funding?Cassarino: Absolutely, we are in current conversations with some very large companies here in the US and South America, some investment companies, because it’s not just a technology we’re creating in the industry here. There are a lot of pieces that really need to come together to build this matrix, lots of pieces of the puzzle that need to have some strategic thinking done, as how we transition into a new energy source. That’s what makes this very exciting. So you know there’s never enough money to make everything happen.(sorry, formatting of the quote may be off and WYS is not WYG)... gmail is weird that way. If there is emphasis on "there's never enough money" it's mine.
