Jones,
I just wanted to remind all of the 3rd alternative which is a
QM based exploitation of Zero Point posited in Jan Naudts paper , Moller's MAHG
, Haisch & Moddel prototype, and "Cavity QED" by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula. The
QM represents the accumulation and segregation of dispersion forces without any
need for gravitational gradients like we are accustomed to at the macro scale
and the migrating gases represent our linkage to HUP resulting in chaotic
motion and where atomic or molecular configuration represents our opportunity
to organize and exploit an asymmetry. The "sudden" breach in isotropy that
Zofia mentions in "cavity QED" is not an isolated incident but rather an entire
tapestry of sudden jumps in suppression level being constantly experienced by
gas atoms loaded into the Ni lattice, defects or powders associated with this
anomaly. The disassociation threshold represents an opportunity to rectify the
chaotic motion of gas into heat energy. In this theory the quiescence you
mention is a runaway condition where the enabling tapestry - geometry melts or
grows cat whiskers that short circuit the suppression. I am not challenging
that tunneling occurs and in fact would better explain the small amounts of
transmuted elements discovered as a small side effect of the Zero Point energy
in runaway.
Regards
Fran
From: Jay Caplan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:MgH2 as hydrogen source
I'd like to solicit comments from the list re the Chan/Phen/Ortiz postings
using MgH2 as H source
http://www.ecatplanet.net/showthread.php?100-Chan-Method-of-Ni-H-fusion as it
would pertain to QM theory, to thermonuclear processes, and to the noted
'quiescence.'
----- Original Message -----
From: Jones Beene<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi's Best Chance
Mark,
The first question that must be answered is: it the Ni-H phenomena Quantum
Mechanical in nature, or is it Thermonuclear, on a reduced scale?
There are some that still believe Ni-H is thermonuclear and in fact, Pd-D could
be. In fact W-L theory tries hard not to be forced into making that decision,
and has QM features - but if the defining detail of that theory involves
neutrons, neutron capture - and subsequent weak-force reactions, just as are
seen in traditional physics - then it is a thermonuclear theory.
Theories that involve tunneling of protons in one form or another are QM based
- if no neutron is involved. QM is normally too low in probability to account
for much heat. But one aftermath of the development of the modern CPU by Intel
and others is that QM tunneling (of electrons) can be engineer and optimized to
occur at very high rates. A CPU operating a 2 GHz will have electrons tunneling
in predictable fashion the high terahertz range. The CPU is a QM electron
tunneling device operating at high probability.
The CPU is a good model to use for proton tunneling - where instead of a small
chip needing to shed 30 watts of heat (and not gainful) you have much more
heat, and importantly it is anomalous due to the tunneling.
If there is gain, then it must be defined. Without going into great detail on
defining the gain for now, except to say that it comes from the mass of the
proton, and it comes without much radiation or transmutation (some of each, but
way too little to account for the gain), then it is easier to account for the
quiescence phenomenon.
Stated simply, quiescence involves "too much depletion" in the mass of the
hydrogen so that the high level of probability of tunneling is reduced. This is
where anything that relates to QM probability come in, and you have already
found papers suggestive of a few of these factors.
Rossi has designed a reactor where hydrogen is not circulated and it is likely
that he could eliminate the problem with periodic dumping of H2 and reloading
(every few hours) on a set schedule. There is evidence that DGT may be doing
this already.
Jones
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
If quiescence is a reality, and *if* it will require a scientific/QM
understanding, the I don't think any amount of 'control engineering' is going
to be much help... one will need to find out the cause of the quiescence, which
is a physics problem...
If the quiescence is of a reasonable periodic nature (i.e., repeatable), or if
it gives you adequate 'warning' that it has started, then one could have 2 or 3
reactor cores inside, only one of which is 'running'. When it begins to go
into quiescence, one then starts up one of the 'idle' cores... while shutting
down the quiescent one. This is a brainless kind of solution, and wouldn't
work if the quiescent core needs to be unassembled in order to make it 'ignite'
again. If reactive capability can be reinstated by shocking it with a hi-V
pulse or cycling H2 pressure, things like that, then it could be automated and
done while in-situ. These are engineering problems, not scientific ones...
-m
