Agreed. I just posted something similar On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Robert Leguillon < robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Earlier in the thread, hydrogen was mentioned as a control mechanism, or a > possible factor to be purged at the onset of quiescence: > I'm having trouble imagining that the existing reactor core has a pile of > nickel, a hydrogen gas fitting, and a hydrogen release for anything short > of emergency evacuation. If the hydrogen can be purged regularly, some very > precise filtering would be necessary to prevent aerosolising nano-nickel > particles and fouling any such relief valve > > > From: jone...@pacbell.net > > > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi's Best Chance > > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:14:53 -0800 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Blanton > > > > > ... suppose it's those slightly different mass protons which are > giving up > > mass that is not replenished by PAMD's sea. It would mean that new H2 > would > > need to be added to the mix to get more "ragged" [sic - rugged?] proton > > mass. > > > > > If Rossi restarts his eCatnapping reactor, do we know how he does it? > > > > > > Well, Rossi could purge and add more H2, for one thing. I do NOT know > that > > is what he does, of course, or else I would be more assertive about the > > explanation. > > > > If he does purge and refill, and then it restarts as easily as it did the > > first time, then it is almost case-closed for this explanation having > some > > validity. > > > > ... or QED, which in his case is a pun on itself :) > > > > J. > > > > > > >
