Morning guys! Yes, the state-space involves numerous variables, and their interactions (e.g., CONstructive vs DEstructive interference)... trying to model it, understand it, and then control it will likely be a monumental task. The complexity of the problem, and it's sensitivity to precise frequencies (because we're dealing with resonances), also makes this a VERY difficult thing to reproduce. -mark
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Resonances: Coupling between electronic states and vibrational modes (phonons)... Jones, My reply was originally to Mark Iverson's thread - I don't know why it started a new one. Mark is citing some experiments showing that photosynthesis is more efficient when driven by selected multiple fixed frequencies, and wonders whether there is a connection with CF/LENR effects. Good question on Ni-H. Rossi apparently uses an RF-generator. I have to check on others, like Miley and Defkalion. Energetics uses ultrasound - their signal is imprecisely defined in their patent application, but it's clearly broadband, and appears to have a discrete "picket-fench" spectrum. Based on the papers I've perused, I'd guess that optimal em/sonic stimulation depends sensitively on particle size, temperature, morphology, density, colloidal formations, crystallization patterns, proximity to surfaces, ... If Rossi's claims are accurate, I'd bet that National Instruments is trying to (somehow) close the loop in this huge state-space to stay in the tiny and elusive stable optimal operating spaces. Thanks, Lou Pagnucco > Lou, > > This kind of photon stimulation was of great interest a few years ago > and is known as the "Letts/Cravens effect". They had a tortuous path > to get it to a useful level when at EarthTech. Many null results in > the process. "Are we there yet?" > > At one time they also were saying that a magnetic field adds to the > effect. > That is of keen interest as well, if this effect relates to quantum > entanglement, in any way. > > Two additional points of interest that jump out to the Ni-H crowd: > > 1) This gain from optical stimulation applies to Pd-D. Does it apply > equally to Ni-H? > 2) The highest gain is at ~15 THZ which is a IR emission (near IR) > better known from its wavelength about 1.5 microns. This corresponds > to a blackbody temperature, so the laser only adds coherency. > > Actually the third point for interest for Ni-H watchers is derivative. > > If the answer to 1) is yes, then should not the active powder be in > the size range of 2)? > > > > ----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > Along those lines, you might want to read - "PROGRESS ON DUAL LASER > EXPERIMENTS" > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Hagelsteinprogresson.pdf > > > EXCERPT: > We have continued our experiments using duel laser stimulation of > electrochemically loaded PdD. In earlier work, we used two properly > oriented and polarized tunable diode lasers which provided stimulation > at optical frequencies; interestingly, we found that the excess heat > is sensitive to the beat difference frequency. Low-level thermal > signals are observed to be triggered at apparent resonances when the > difference frequency is 8.3, > 15.3 and 20.4 THz > > Perhaps, also related is the ultrasonic "Superwave" LENR stimulation > used by Energetics Technologies - > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIultrasonic.pdf > My impression is that their source has a wideband discrete spectrum of > phase-locked frequencies - so that the same stimulus signal is > repeatedly swept. > >
