This video has shown they have a lab something our departed "colleague" Mary Yugo has denied. Instead of speculating in advance let's wait what will they show us. A basic problem is HOW MANY Ni (Transition Metal) - H ANOMALIES DO EXIST? Peter
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Peter Gluck > * > * Jones, and why do they claim > 650C and an experiment with duration > of 48/48 hours? > > Well, maybe so, Peter - but that is not in evidence in the video we are > talking about. > > If they have indeed gotten to both that level of heat, and for that length > of time - in the same experiment with a heat sink - then that is a huge > advance. But so far as far as they admit, the gain is far less than you > think because they say no coolant. No delta T is mentioned. > > Sure - they have the Ni-H power anomaly, first seen back in 1990, and yes > they may be able to get the device up to 650 C, which is a surprise - but > if > you do not remove heat via a heat sink, then what do you really have? > > When you insulate well - and then add only the small amount of lost heat > through the insulation (10 watts or so) - then - sure you can come back in > 48 hours and find the same 650 you started out with two days earlier. That > may indicate a power anomaly but it is not where we expected them to be > now. > > Based on what they were saying many months ago - I expected to see at this > time the glycol heat exchanger, and evidence of steady levels of ongoing > energy - not just a few power surges. This is what they were claiming back > then. > > So yes, DGT have at least "stretched the truth" beyond what is considered > to > be total honesty. Not that Mills is not FAR worse in doing the same. > > Jones > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
