I would like to thank DGT for allowing me to view this particular video. I have worked within product development labs in the past and feel that the one seen in the video is not unlike many of those. The equipment that is required depends upon what they are testing or upon whether or not they are trying out a new idea. We do not know exactly what procedures are being conducted so I think it is premature to assume the worst.
It was not very long ago when some of our major skeptics were suggesting that even this level of display was not available. It was suggested that DGT was effectively a shell company and that no product exists. This video clearly proves that they were wrong. So let's give DGT a chance to reveal more of their product information before we shoot the messenger. What they have shown is an important first start of much to come. I prefer to be an optimist that sees the glass half full of water instead of one who sees it half empty. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2012 10:57 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Defkalion video of internal testing Despite the shortcomings of the experimental setup, I would have thought t should be possible to use dataplots such as these to characterise the hermal characteristics of the a dummy hyperion system providing we know he power input. This should give usable figures for heat capacities nd thermal couplings. This could then be used to give an indication of the excess heat from he 'real' reactor, and it should then be possible to give a good stimation of the error range of any results obtained this way. I seem o remember that Mary Yugo(?) got someone to do something along these ines with a previous set of data. Some of the uncertainty would be removed if the two runs were done with he same reactor, first with the Ni/H in the reactor, and then second ith a dummy powder with approximately the same thermal capacity. The lectrical heat input in the second run should mirror the heat input hat was used for the first run. If we there are two reactors, then doing a real test on both and then a ummy test on both would be even better as it might allow additional uantification of the errors. Nigel On 30/01/2012 15:01, Jones Beene wrote: What is curious is the chart on the laptop. Blow it up. Of course, we do not know what it purports to show, but the two spikes are indicative of what have been known to appear in many early H2 fractional hydrogen experiments in the past. Jones
