The weighting is explained in the document ... there is a final weighting
of the individual scores. I'm not sure what a perfect score was -- 406
was the highest entry.
The public meeting for Energy was
TA03: Space Power and Energy Storage
Systems March 24, 2011 California
so it's essentially pre-Rossi.
I didn't see any CF/LENR competence on the panels. Fusion included some
HOT fusion technologies, so they're left in the cold (intentional pun),
too.
On THAT basis their ranking is probably reasonable.
- [Vo]:NASA Roadmap Alan J Fletcher
- Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap Alan J Fletcher
- [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR??? Wm. Scott Smith
- RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR... Roarty, Francis X
- RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Alan, what is S... Alan J Fletcher
- RE: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR??? Robert Leguillon
- Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap : MINUS 39 / 406 (max... Alan J Fletcher
- Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap : MINUS 39 / 406 ... Alan J Fletcher
- Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap Alan J Fletcher