Don't understand the confusion.
The LEFT half of the chart has the word 'CONTROL' written above it in BIG letters, the RIGHT half has NANOR above it; NANOR being Schwartz's acronym for his version of LENR technology. The traces look to be continuous (i.e., from the same sensors), thus, he must have had a calibrating resistor inside that he could use to introduce a known amount of energy. Yes we need more details to feel comfortable about it, and hopefully Dr. Schwartz will provide them. -mark From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Comment from Dr Mitchell Schwartz on Krivit Mitchell Swartz published this: http://world.std.com/~mica/krivit02052012.html <http://world.std.com/%7Emica/krivit02052012.html> In the first figure, the green line appears to be the response to input power being stepped up. I guess this green line shows the temperature in a control cell. Anyway, that is a splendid stable response, well in proportion to the input power. This allays some of my concerns about the calorimetry. However, I would like to know more about it. I do not not mean I suspect Swartz made a mistake. I wouldn't know. I just meant there are many way to make a mistake doing low power calorimetry, so you have to be careful. - Jed
