Hmm, people are suspecting that Schwartz pulled a "Rossi"? 2012/2/5 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>
> Don’t understand the confusion…**** > > ** ** > > The LEFT half of the chart has the word ‘CONTROL’ written above it in BIG > letters, the RIGHT half has NANOR above it; NANOR being Schwartz’s acronym > for his version of LENR technology. The traces look to be continuous > (i.e., from the same sensors), thus, he must have had a calibrating > resistor inside that he could use to introduce a known amount of energy.** > ** > > ** ** > > Yes we need more details to feel comfortable about it, and hopefully Dr. > Schwartz will provide them…**** > > **** > > -mark**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:29 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Comment from Dr Mitchell Schwartz on Krivit**** > > ** ** > > Mitchell Swartz published this: > **** > > http://world.std.com/~mica/krivit02052012.html**** > > > In the first figure, the green line appears to be the response to input > power being stepped up. I guess this green line shows the temperature in a > control cell. Anyway, that is a splendid stable response, well in > proportion to the input power. This allays some of my concerns about the > calorimetry. However, I would like to know more about it. > > I do not not mean I suspect Swartz made a mistake. I wouldn't know. I just > meant there are many way to make a mistake doing low power calorimetry, so > you have to be careful. > > - Jed**** > > ** ** > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
