they seems to talk of a differente circle, more powerful : the chemical (covalent link) cycle : H2-> H H -> H2
what the paper talk about is more a Cooper link 2012/2/9 Nigel Dyer <[email protected]> > Julian's Cooper pair proposal could result in a cooling after death. If > we assume that the reactor is cooling anyway, and that as a result protons > are moving out of the Nickel lattice, which would require/result in the > breaking of the cooper pairs which would take, rather than release energy, > which is the energy that was originally released when the pairs formed. > > This would serve to make calorimetry more difficult, but Defkalion are > right IMHO that any such endothermic-exothermic circle has no effect on the > COP, although I am not convinced that 'chemical' would be the best > description of this particular circle. > > Nigel > > > On 08/02/2012 21:20, Alain Sepeda wrote: > >> in their answer on "Triggering" method, >> http://www.defkalion-energy.**com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=**5983#p5983<http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5983#p5983> >> Defkalion have talk about >> a well know "Heat after death" that is purely chemical >> >> >> There is a predictable very limited "heat after death" phenomenon >> following >> >>> every long- period stop of a reactor/reaction. This is a well known and >>> well documented phenomenon related with the H2-> H1-> H2 circle >>> (chemical, >>> non LENR energy), which is monitored by sensors and the Hyperion >>> safety/control electronics/software. The contribution of such >>> endothermic-exothermic circle to the COP of the total process is almost >>> zero. >>> >> >> >> 2012/2/8 Nigel Dyer<[email protected]> >> >> He suggests that the pairing energy level is of the order of 1eV, which >>> is >>> a chemical reaction sort of energy. >>> >> >
