-----Original Message----- From: Bastiaan Bergman > it is said that the reason RM never actively pursues - or mentions the so-called "deuterino" (reduced orbital deuterium species) relates to potential weaponization.
> How can Deuterinos be weaponized? Let's be clear on this. It is most unlikely that they can be weaponized, but Mills' silence on the subject, combined with a former Military General on his Board, and funding from Pentagon contractors, makes the situation suspicious. Plus, many who are attracted to LENR either believe in, or have a tolerant attitude towards, any number of high level conspiracy theories. > And why Deuterinos specifically? For that you need to understand the BEC and bosons in the context of a much denser starting molecule. Unlike the gaseous phase, any BEC can attain high density according to the theory. And that is on top of the natural density. In a BEC, immobile atoms or molecules share the same quantum state. A much denser bosonic starting molecule would likely form a Bose condensate more easily, and at higher temperature than near absolute zero, due to inherent restriction of degrees of freedom which is itself due to near-field and magnetic proximity effects. Even so, there is no experimental indication that a BEC of deuterons would fuse more easily on spherical implosion, AFAIK. Most experts assume this would be the case, but lacking proof, it is only a presumption. The liquid density of H2 is .07 gm/cc. Volume and density would have a cubic power law with radius. Based then on extending the H2 model, liquid n=1/3 hydrinos should weigh in at 1.89 gm/cc and n=1/4 would be 4.48 and n=1/7 would be over 24 gm/cc - higher than the density of any known element including osmium (the densest). Mills claimed years ago to have samples of n=1/7 but in the form of a salt (bound chemical hydride). IOW, if you believe and extend Mills CQM theory, then there is no reason that D2 at deep redundancy cannot exist as an ultra-dense liquid BEC. Note, this one important detail - that even though the density of shrunken di-deuterino molecules would be every high on paper, the same does not apply to hydrides (and to ionic bonding). This is because the shrunken variety would probably be nested (actually located most of the time *inside* the orbital cloud of the host cation or "carrier"), and perhaps thus could be even less dense than before. Deuterinos, like hydrinos should be found in ocean minerals, particularly the alkalis. Sodium (as the major cation in salt water) could be a deuterino "carrier" and it would collect those which are made in the Solar corona and arrive over the millennia in the Oceans of earth via solar wind. Once life evolved to use the anion (deuterino hydride) for energy in a deep cold lake, the carrier would shift from the salt to the lifeform. If deuterinos are used by any lifeform found in Lake Vostok, then they would eventually accumulate in proteins. So-called "Zwitterions" contain an anionic center and a cationic center in the same molecule, but are not considered to be salts. Examples include amino acids and proteins. The only imaginable way the I can see to weaponize whatever is found in Lake Vostok, is IF there is a species evolved to use deuterinos, and it is cloned to actually grow and be harvested in someplace like Siberia, and harvested deuterinos are thus produced in tonnage. This is extraordinarily unlikely - but cannot be overlooked as possible. > And why would one who gets convinced about the existence of Hydrinos not make the step to Deuterinos? Indeed, why not - but for some nebulous risk factor related to international intrigue? Looks like you have your conspiracy theory 'credentials' in order. Proceed to checkout :) Jones
