-----Original Message----- Hi Mauro, But the "experts" have been consistently wrong of late! No one predicted the recent surge, nor the prior lull of the previous year. And no one that I can find has tied the more massive spots to EC. Are you defending this sloppy record? NASA is the worst of all in lack of accuracy, usually followed by a cover-up!
The EC connection is a purpose of my suggestion, and since it is obvious that I am not an astrophysicist - it could be wrong. But can these so-called experts overlook something relevant? Yes! and in this field they often do. Their track record is not good. In short, NASA's own climatologists and solar experts are often no better than glorified TV weather forecasters with advanced degrees. Despite this most recent oversight (and two prior ones) - the experts seem to be sticking with the notion that the 2013 or later will be the peak. Maybe it will be in a technical sense - but that is in 'numbers only', since charts often do not factor in the magnitude of individual events. And the magnitude of individual events in recent months seems to be coordinated with EC's recent activity. That is my main point. Yes - of course, my references to the Maya and 2012 is in jest (partially). But that is a non-issue relative to EC. One wants to liven up these discussions up a bit, no? 2012 always carries extra interest. Plus some of this confusion on solar activity (being manipulated) seems to be politically motivated. The recent evidence that global warming has moderated and not increased in the significant way once predicted - is an embarrassment to many climatologists, as it should be. They operate in an inexact science, but they want to be heard in the political arena. The two don't mix. Many now attempt to cover their rear-ends and blame bad modeling of human factors on reduced solar activity, when the best evidence for the conclusion is that the bad models themselves! In short, there is no real evidence of decreased solar activity, and the evidence of recent massive sunspots is a continuing embarrassment to experts - none of whom seem to be even remotely aware of the EC connection, and all of whom seem to be trying to save face. I hope this doesn't relate to Maya-2012, but there is little harm in mentioning it. Jones > If you are new to Vortex, you may not realize that we have a unwanted and > powerful neighbor in the galaxy named Eta Carinae. It is starting to act up > now, and it may be taking out sun along for the ride. Aside from the 2012 > (Mayan) hoopla, this is looking like a big year for solar activity. > Jones, even when I consistently enjoy your speculative and imaginative posts, I want to make some comments: 2012 can be a big year for solar activity, but according to recent predictions, the cycle's peak will be late to the 2012 end-of-times party, in May 2013. And the biggest sunspots and related activity usually occur after the maximum, when the Sun is heading again for solar minimum. And, according to Eta Carina 5.52 years cycle, its next spectroscopic event will be around January 2014, even later. Finally, there's no need for entanglement, strangelets or other exotic (or strangely sounding) mechanisms to explain an interaction with something 8000 light years away. Simply, the effects reaching us now had their causes there, only 8000 years ago. What I find interesting is the possibility that Eta Carina's 5.52 year cycle can influence or modulate the solar cycle, to a certain extent. If that 5.5 years cycle can be associated with this solar cycle's delay, with 2008's unusual activity, and with solar activity in general, that would be a very good finding. Regards, Mauro > http://www.astrosociety.org/education/publications/tnl/79/79.html > > Figuratively, Eta Carinae is the closest thing to "evil" (wanton > destructiveness) that anyone can imagine, even considering black holes. It > is in the constellation Carinae - "the keel" which is visible from the > Southern Hemisphere - about 8000 light years away. It could be both > progenitor and destroyer, in a way. > > Earth is about 27,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way but Eta > Carinae is less than a third of the way to the core, and it isn't associated > with a black hole - in fact EC is closer to us and often beams more energy > than the entire galaxy core, as seen by us. Here is what it looks like: > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0208/Breathtaking-Carina-nebula-photo- > provides-window-into-star-nursery > > It is not yet clear what supplies the radiated energy that can peak at 10^50 > ergs, but this output has been cyclically tied to abnormal solar activity on > our sun. Curiously, one of the main power sources is likely to be nickel, in > the sense of decay to 56Ni from heavier mass (according to spectroscopy). > > We see this massive energy peak coming from EC on a particular temporal > cycle, and when we talked about it here on Vortex the last time that it > peaked (~5+ years ago), it was in regard to abnormal sunspots at a time when > we were supposed to be in a solar minimum. Our sun's cycle could be tied > directly to the EC cycle for a number of reasons, but how can it "skip" and > feel only every other one of EC's cycles ? Or else, it is a spectacular > coincidence. > > Eta Carinae seems to be powered by the see-saw death and rebirth of an > extremely massive star system. It is a 'repeat offender' regularly gaining > and loosing mass in "hundred-sun" quanta. And the main output vector seems > to be pointed at our sun like a rifle. > > In fact, EC could be the final remnant of a captured galaxy itself. Even if > we limit the present speculation to a focused discharge from EC, traveling > fairly close to light-speed, what kind of accelerated mass-energy fits these > circumstances (disruptive enough to cause sunspots 8000 years removed) ? It > must be strange, as in "strangelets". > > Can this kind of directed influence happen at all over 8000 l.y. or does it > demand some kind of quantum entanglement of two systems, which goes back in > time to a "genesis" event? IOW this may have been the predecessor star > system for us, and that explains why we are still 'entangled' to a degree. > > Plus, the tie-in to nickel is also a coincidental detail that may not be > completely random, vis-à-vis other phenomena - if some kind of weird quantum > entanglement exist between us and our "keel". > > Anyway - let's hope it does not keel-over on us later this year... but... > yes, to answer a lingering question - methinks the Maya would surely have > been aware of Eta Carinae and its regular cycle. > > On occasion, it can be the brightest star in the heavens. > > Jones > >
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
