I am under the impression that the antigravity concept has been discussed in details on vortex before. Unfortunately, I was not privileged to be involved in that discussion so I have one concept that seems to be required for it to function.
Assume that a mass of material is shielded by an antigravity system of some type. The same mass requires a certain amount of energy to raise it upward a meter without the system. My suspicion is that at least this amount of energy must be expended by the antigravity device if the same final mass displacement is achieved. The conservation of energy would require this to happen in my opinion. Has this issue been covered before in the collective? Dave -----Original Message----- From: LORENHEYER <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Feb 23, 2012 11:49 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:100 years 1912 beep beep beep and aliens Antigravity can 'only' have what might be considered an on-board pplication, and so, anyone who has either a vested-interest, or money, or great aith n it, simply doesn't know about the enormous potential of the yet ndiscovered system, that can have no equal. While it does require a moving part pinning at a very high rate of Rpm's, it's the only way to generate the rinciple dynamic force that will enable an altogether powerfully new efficient orm of 'independent' propulsion that will enable a like vehicle/craft to ravel space in the extreme, to anywhere that may be at anytime (read it & eep!). << As I read of Jed and his predictions I wonder will his be bettor or orse. They had the right idea in 1912 but the wrong implementation. No one ad a clue of the coming internet until it happened. Some see only tragedy. see anti-gravity and cold fusion. >> /HTML>
