Getting back to "Reality" so to speak: Here is Mills' thinking on a robust battery, based on fractional hydrogen (hydrino) operating as the electrolyte itself:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/battery.shtml And yes, this would be simple and effective, if this species were stable and could be contained. But Mills has had well over a decade to produce a prototype and none has been seen. That may only mean this particular method does not work when another slightly related method could work, especially if the other method depends simply on an "energetic electrode reaction" and not a new kind of charge carrier. What I am suggesting is that the gain does not need to be related to Mills hydrided charge carrier, but instead could be related to enhancing the redox see-saw that is already there. If one can produce a battery with recurrent EUV reactions happening on an electrode (either electrode), then these photons will reverse the local oxidation states and provide extra energy that way. This is a completely different way of doing what Mills proposes, and it is not unlike the Bedini method. However, let me say there is zero evidence that these guys in SA have done this, and even if they have, John Bedini has the expertise and a patent portfolio that is looking to be almost bulletproof, so only a fool would follow Sterling Allan's advice. I'll repeat the prediction that Sterling will never receive a working device from them. Jones -----Original Message----- From: integral.property.serv...@gmail.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:South Africa Fuel-Free Generator Report : Theory? Jones: From what I gather, a lead storage battery alone can power a device at the same time it is being charged by an oscillating circuit containing inductors, capacitors and diodes. With proper tuning an LENR reaction within the battery would supply the the energy. Keeping it simple, Reality
