You are in such a hurry. I will wait until Oct30th. I chose this date last year, for a 3rd party confirmation of a working product, because it is close to AR`s 1MW test. I will apply the same date to DGT.
2012/3/1 Jarold McWilliams <[email protected]> > DGT may not owe us anything, but I don't owe them anything either. > Defkalion has shown us nothing, and Rossi just had some demos that he was > in complete control of. I don't owe them any patience, though I will still > wait until March 31. If nothing happens by then, there is no reason for me > to pay any more attention to this. Maybe it's just me, but if I was in > Defkalion's position, I'd get independent verification as soon as possible. > They should get plenty of money through awards and licenses if they sell > the product to a large company. Everyday, the world is wasting billions of > dollars and millions of people are dying unnecessarily. Just the discovery > of an LENR device that produces useful energy output would end this waste > immediately. Does it really make a difference if you are making a billion > dollars in a world where basically everything is free? I would be happy > enough knowing I helped every single person on the planet, and I wouldn't > care much about the money. I'm not big into conspiracy theories. Oil > companies would probably just switch to something dealing with LENR and > make more money than before. If you're a scientist, it would create tons > of good paying jobs, and you are at the forefront in an exciting new era of > civilization. > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > > Hi Guenter -- your reply-to address is your own email address. > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Guenter Wildgruber <[email protected] > > wrote: > > DGT did not make a substantial error up to now. >> Btw, my own projects often have delays and complications and >> modifications. That's the way it is. >> >> In a situation like DGK or Rossi You have to fight against a headwind of >> 99%, and the rest is a substantial lot of idiots, who cannot tell the >> difference between a hole and a substantial spot. >> > > I agree with Defkalion that they are not obligated to continue to publicly > discuss their progress. But from a PR perspective I think it's a gauche > move to close their forum in this way. They've given skeptics additional > credibility in calling the two main high-profile commercial LENR > initiatives scams. Perhaps this will not affect Defkalion's own business > plan since they're self-funded, but it could have ramifications for others > who are interested in exploring the topic. > > It might have been preferable for Defkalion not to attempt to engage the > public at all and to stay in stealth mode as long as possible. I can > understand their learning about PR as they go. But with opinions so set > against LENR in some mainstream scientific circles, here's to hoping that > other initiatives will steer a steadier course in how they communicate to > the public what they're doing. > > Eric > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
